JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 23, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Guillermo Restrepo Paniagua Vs Juzgado Veintisiete Civil Municipal De Medellin

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Normas que determinan la competencia
Conflicto De Competencia
  • Remisión expediente a quien se repartió en primer lugar
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para dirimir conflictos de competencia
6 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de Competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Superior de Medellín, Sala Civil y el Juzgado Quinto Civil del Circuito de Medellín, en torno al trámite de la acción de tutela de la referencia.

Se reitera temática relacionada con la facultad de la Corporación para resolver conflictos de competencia en la jurisdicción constitucional; sobre el marco jurídico que determina esta competencia en materia de tutela y las reglas para solucionar los mismos.

Se decide el asunto ordenando enviar el expediente a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Medellín, para que de forma inmediata trámite la acción de tutela deprecada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto del veintitres (23) de abril de dos mil catorce (2014), proferido por el Tribunal Superior de Medellin, Sala Civil, mediante el cual se declaro incompetente para conocer de la accion de tutela presentada por Guillermo Restrepo Paniagua contra el Juzgado 27 Civil Municipal de Medellin y el Juzgado 2o Civil del Circuito de Medellin.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Superior de Medellin, Sala Civil, para que de forma inmediata tramite la accion de tutela mencionada.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, COMUNICAR al Juzgado 5o Civil del Circuito de Medellin la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.